RESEARCH ARTICLE


Functional Evaluation of Awareness in Vegetative and Minimally Conscious State



Silvia Marino1, 2, *, Lilla Bonanno1, Rosella Ciurleo1, Annalisa Baglieri1, Rosa Morabito1, Silvia Guerrera1, Carmela Rifici1, Antonio Giorgio3, Placido Bramanti1, Nicola De Stefano3
1 IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino Pulejo”, Messina, Italy
2 Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Italy
3 UOSA Experimental Neurology, Dept. of Medicine, Surgery & Neuroscience, University of Siena, Italy


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 1372
Abstract HTML Views: 865
PDF Downloads: 288
ePub Downloads: 213
Total Views/Downloads: 2738
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 616
Abstract HTML Views: 515
PDF Downloads: 194
ePub Downloads: 140
Total Views/Downloads: 1465



© 2017 Marino et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Neurobioimaging Laboratory, IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino Pulejo”, 98124, Messina, Italy, Tel: +39-090-60128968, Fax: +39-090-60128950, E-mail: silvimarino@gmail.com


Abstract

Objective:

The aim of this study was to assess differences in brain activation in a large sample of Vegetative State (VS) and Minimally Conscious State (MCS) patients, using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI).

Methods:

We studied 50 patients four to seven months after brain injury. By using international clinical criteria and validated behavioural scales such as the Glasgow Coma Scale and the Clinical Unawareness Assessment Scale, the patients were grouped into VS (n=23) and MCS (n=27). All patients underwent to fMRI examination. After 6 months, the patients were reassessed using Glasgow Outcome Scale and Revised Coma Recovery Scale.

Results:

fMRI showed significant (p<0.01, cluster-corrected) brain activation in the primary auditory cortex bilaterally during the acoustic stimuli in patients with both VS and MCS. However, ten patients clinically classified as VS, showed a pattern of brain activation very similar to that of MCS patients. Six months later, these ten VS patients had significant clinical improvement, evolving into MCS, whereas the other VS patients and patients with MCS remained clinically stable.

Conclusion:

Brain activity could help in discerning whether the status of wakefulness in VS is also accompanied by partial awareness, as occurs in MCS. This may have very important prognostic implications.

Keywords: Differential diagnosis, Functional magnetic resonance imaging, Minimally conscious state, Outcome, Vegetative state.